Tuesday, May 7, 2019

How to make current handgun control laws stronger, and more Research Proposal

How to cook current handgun concord laws stronger, and more enforceable - Research Proposal ExampleInstead it commotion an umbrella protection to everyone by making laws which are unimpeachably worth their weight in gold tho are not actu ally imposed by all states. The gaps between state and federal official official gun control laws make the problem even worse.Federal gun control policy is transparent firearms must not reach irresponsible or dangerous people. This approach is particularly uncontroversial and thusly approved by most quarters. Some of the key laws in this regard are the 1968 law passed in response to the killing of Robert Kennedy, the federal law prohibiting sale of firearm without background check, and prohibition on gross sales to illegal aliens. These laws should have been good enough to stop some incidents like the Virginia Tech massacre but the reason they failed lies in gaps existing between state and federal laws. Due to these gaps, Seung-Hui Cho was ne ver reported to the federal police as he has already been termed mentally ill. According to 1968 federal law, people who are adjudicated as a mental defective are prohibited from possessing firearms. This is probably the most significant piece of canon on gun control in last 50 years. Even though attempts have been do to pass some other laws too, none have been as significant in their impact as the ordnance store Control Act of 1968. The main objectives of the Act were as follows (1) Eliminating the interstate traffic in firearms and ammunition that had antecedently frustrated state and local efforts to license, register, or restrict ownership of guns. (2) Denying access to firearms to certain congressionally defined groups, including minors, convicted felons, and persons who had been adjudicated as mental defectives or committed to mental institutions. (3) Ending the importation of all surplus military firearms and all other guns unless certified by the Secretary of the Treasur y as particularly suitable for ... sporting purposes.2The country needs stricter gun control laws but a recent US Supreme coquette decision may give another message. In June 2008, US Supreme court gave an emphatic gesture to firearm owners when it overturned a Washington DC ban on possession of guns. No other recent decision was as vital in significance as this one since it offered an interpretation of the morsel Amendment and also explained how constitution treats the subject. In writing the majority opinion, Justice Scalia, ruled that the Constitute does not empathize the absolute prohibition of handguns held and used for self-defense in the home.3For this reason gun control laws are definitely one of the most controversial issues in the country. Even though we acknowledge the need for stricter gun control laws, the Supreme Court interpretations of the Constitutions and other redresss, often create a hurdle for the implementation and passing of these laws. Jenson (2007) write s flatulence control legislation has had a long and inconsistent history in the United States. Congress offset passed laws controlling firearms in the early 20th century. Throughout the past century, the issue has been debated frequently by opponents and proponents. for each one side has used a different interpretation of the Second Amendment of the Constitution, a provision giving citizens the right to bear arms, to boost its arguments for or against gun control.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.